* Saturday, 30 January 2010 | JJ Boys Attack Asemfofro * Source: Daily Guide | A GROUP of National Democratic Congress (NDC) activists, allegedly acting on the orders of Kofi Adams, Special Aide to former President Jerry John Rawlings, attacked Osei Yaw Nketia, popularly known as Dr. Asemfofro, at the party’s headquarters on Thursday.
 The maverick NDC activist was at the headquarters to discuss important issues with the General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketia, when he was reportedly attacked.
Speaking to DAILY GUIDE soon after he had reported the matter to the Nima Divisional Police, Asemfofro said he was slapped and heckled by a group of six people (four men and two women) who said they had come to punish him for certain comments he had made against the party’s founder, Jerry Rawlings.
According to him, as the gang slapped and roughed him up, one of them said it was Kofi Adams who directed that they pounce on him whenever he stepped into the party office.
“For close to thirty minutes, they heckled me until I was whisked away into a taxi by some sympathizers. When I later called Kofi Adams over the allegation that he ordered the attack, he simply told me that I deserved whatever I got,” he said.
He however said he would not be deterred by the attacks on his life, saying going to the party headquarters or expressing his opinion on political issues are his democratic rights.
The loud-mouthed NDC activist hit the political limelight during the Kufuor Administration when he led several demonstrations against the then government. He became more controversial when he waded into the Mills-Rawlings rift, pitching his camp with President Mills.
The last time he was in the news, Asemfofro described Rawlings as a dangerous man who can stage a coup to overthrow the Mills Administration.
According to him, Rawlings was still thirsting to become the president of this country even though he has served his term as president. He wondered what Rawlings was able to achieve during his rule, arguing “his 19-year rule of Ghana was distasteful and nothing to write home about”.
“Rawlings demonstrated his burning desire to become president again of this country the day after he handed over power to former President John Agyekum Kufuor which was January 8, 2001,” he intimated.
The die-hard NDC activist therefore asked Mr. Rawlings to “shut up and allow President Mills to rule this country”.
He advised Mr. Rawlings to take a cue from past presidents like Bill Clinton of the USA and Olushegun Obasanjo of Nigeria among others, and learn to conduct himself in the way and manner they have.
Before then, he exposed certain NDC functionaries whom he alleged were neck-deep in a flagrant car-sharing syndicate at the Castle.
Asemfofro said he had since received a series of threats on his life and was therefore not surprised that he was attacked even at the party headquarters.
The Nima police are investigating the allegation; however efforts to contact Kofi Adams have proved futile. | | | Greenlight For NPP Congress * Source: Daily Guide | AT LONG last, the Kumasi High Court 2 has given permission to the Ashanti regional branch of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to hold its regional delegates’ congress.
Several attempts by the party to organize its regional delegates’ congress to elect its regional officers have failed to materialize due to protracted court litigations.
Originally, the congress was slated to take place on November 15, 2009, but it did not come off as scheduled due to some outstanding court litigations filed by some of the constituency members.
After that misfortune, the congress was rescheduled for December 30, 2009, but again, it could not work out following the placement of an interlocutory injunction order on the congress.
On December 23, 2009 Nana Adu Asabere sought an injunction from the Kumasi High Court 2, restraining the national and regional executives of the party from holding the regional delegates’ congress.
Nana Asabere’s concern at the time was that 14 constituencies in the region were yet to organize their constituency elections, hence the holding of a regional delegates’ congress would, by design, disenfranchise delegates from those constituencies.
Unfortunately, the duration of the injunction was extended and the case was adjourned to January 27, 2010 when it was first called for hearing on Monday, January 11, 2010.
The court, presided over by Justice Jacob Boon, upheld the plea for extension after counsel for the plaintiff, Owusu Sekyere, had indicated that eight more constituencies were yet to hold their elections.
Though counsel for the defendants, Dennis Agyei, humbly pleaded with the court to lift the injunction to enable his clients organize their congress, Justice Boon did not budge but extended the duration of the order.
Hoping to get a go-ahead from the court to organize the congress, the party fixed January 19, 2010 for the congress, but that date had to be changed when the injunction was extended rather than lifted.
Confident that the court would strike out the order at its sitting on the January 27, the National Council, the second highest decision-making body of the party, at a meeting fixed the much-anticipated congress for Thursday, January 28.
For the umpteenth time, this treasured dream of the party was crushed on Thursday when Justice Boon again refused to strike out the injunction order.
Appearing resolute to convince Justice Boon to strike out the order, Mr. Agyei informed the court that all constituencies in the region, except one, had held their elections.
In his efforts to persuade the court to lift the order, the renowned lawyer drew the court’s attention to the fact that Article 7 of the party’s constitution authorizes the party to hold a regional congress when one third of delegates are confirmed.
The Ashanti regional president of the Ghana Bar Association (GBA) contended that the plaintiff’s action had become mute with respect to time, therefore praying the court to disregard the injunction.
Mr. Agyei further pleaded with the court to consider the supreme interest of the party and relegate the interest of individuals to the background by striking out the order to enable the party hold their congress.
He contended that the party is working with a schedule; therefore the continuous postponement of the regional congress due to the injunction was throwing the party’s plans out of gear.
Mr. Agyei stressed that the constant adjournment of the Ashanti regional congress was causing untold inconveniences to the party as the national delegates’ congress, billed for February 27, had been affected.
Taking his turn to address the court, Mr. Sekyere pleaded with the court not to lift the injunction, arguing that the concerns of his client were still relevant.
He explained that once there was still one constituency yet to hold its constituency elections; it would not be fair for the party to conduct the congress because such an action would disenfranchise delegates from that constituency.
Mr. Sekyere refuted Mr. Agyei’s argument that Article 7 of the party’s constitution gives approval for a regional congress to be held when one third of delegates are confirmed.
He quoted Article 7 Section 13 of the party’s constitution which talks about membership of the party’s delegates, emphasizing that the mention of constituency executives as part of the membership was paramount and should therefore not be disregarded.
The young legal luminary said once the membership of the constituency executives were not complete due to the absence of executives from the Asokwa constituency, the holding of the congress would constitute a breach of the party’s constitution.
At the time of sitting, the Asokwa constituency was the only one in the region that had not yet elected its officers due to a similar injunction order.
After listening to the arguments put forward by both counsels, Justice Boon said he needed time to study the presentations before he could make an informed decision on the matter, he therefore adjourned sitting to January 29, 2010.
Ostensibly devastated by the development, Peter Mac Manu, the party’s National Chairman, politely made an appeal to Justice Boon to come to their aid by lifting the injunction to enable the party hold its congress.
Inspite of his sad commentary that the party’s calendar would be markedly affected in the wake of a further adjournment of the case, Justice Boon did not tamper justice with mercy, adjourning the sitting anyway.
Unable to do anything about the judgment, Mr. Mac Manu, who was accompanied by party gurus such as Dr. Anthony Osei Akoto, Elizabeth Agyeman, Kofi Jumah, Yaw Amankwah and others, left the court room dejected.
Fortunately, when the case was called on Friday morning, Mr. Sekyere announced to the court that his client was not interested in continuing with the case, therefore the court should strike out the injunction.
This, according to him, was primarily because the concerns which motivated his client to seek the injunction from the court had been adequately addressed.
Mr. Sekyere explained that his client is fully satisfied because all the constituencies in the region have conducted their elections to select their officers who will be part of the congress.
After the announcement was made, Justice Boon declared that the court could not continue hanging on to the case. He therefore announced that he had struck out the injunction.
Strangely, Justice Boon did not award any cost against the defendant or the plaintiff as is normally done when a case is struck out.
The Asokwa Constituency, which was the only constituency yet to hold its elections, did so on Thursday after the same court on Wednesday struck out an injunction placed on it by some aggrieved polling station executives in the constituency.
Apparently relieved by the striking out of the injunction, John Kusi Boakye, Chairman of the Election Committee, told DAILY GUIDE that the congress will come off on Monday at the Cultural Centre in Kumasi. | > BACK to TOP < |
_____________________________________________________ ----- | Archived News for 2010 | | | Saturday, 30 January 2010 | - JJ Boys Attack Asemfofro - Greenlight For NPP Congress - Govt spends ¢210m on Drinks | | | Archived News for 2010 | Go to 29.01.2010 Go to 28.01.2010 Go to 27.01.2010 Go to 26.01.2010 Go to 25.01.2010 | Go to 15.01.2010 Go to 14.01.2010 Go to 13.01.2010 Go to 12.01.2010 Go to 11.01.2010 Go to 10.01.2010 Go to 09.01.2010 Go to 08.01.2010 Go to 07.01.2010 Go to 06.01.2010 Go to 05.01.2010 Go to 04.01.2010 | | Your REPORT Your STORIES * Your PHOTOS PUBLISH NOW! | 
| | All about the Ghana Election 2008 | | | 
| 
| | | | * 30.01.2010 | Govt spends ¢210m on Drinks * Source: The Chronice | The minority members of parliament were yesterday taken aback when the Minister of Education, Mr. Alex Tettey-Enyo, told the house that as much as GH¢21,600 was spent on refreshments alone during the various educational fora that discussed the duration of the Senior High School programme. The Minister, who appeared before the House to answer questions relating to his ministry, further told the house that the amount represented almost fifty percent of the total amount spent on the programme.
Before the minister could finish his submissions, an unidentified member from the minority side, screamed at the top of his voice “Eei, GH¢21,600 spent on tea alone?”
The minority became jittery about the Minister’s disclosure, and began asking probing questions to know how much was spent on other items. “Madam Speaker, I would like the Minister to give the full details of how much was spent on other items,” asked the Member of Parliament (MP) for Asunafo-North, Robert Sarfo-Mensah. But, Majority Leader Alban Bagbin intervened to give the Minister a lifeline. “Tell them, tell them the number of people who attended the fora,” Bagbin whispered from behind.
With this intervention, Tettey-Enyo told the House, “Madam Speaker, this expenditure was spent on about one thousand participants.” To prevent being heckled by the minority members, who were fired up to ask questions, the Education Minister declined to give further details on the expenditure.
Earlier on, Mr. Tetteh-Enyo told the House that his ministry had communicated the outcome of the fora on the duration of years for Senior High School, in the form of a memorandum to Cabinet for approval.
This, he said, was to enable the government reverse the duration for Senior High School education, from the current four years, to three years. “Cabinet accepted the proposed reversal to three years, and indicated that school enrolment for the three-year program should commence in September 2010,” he told the House.
According to him, Cabinet had also approved the implementation plan for the reversal to three years.
He further told members that the three-year SHS program was still in the preparatory process for its implementation, but gave the assurance that, “the reversal will still take place.”
However, the question of whether or not Parliament would approve the reversal of the four-year duration to three years still remains unknown, since the House appears divided on the issue.
The minority New Patriotic Party (NPP), then in majority, had reversed the duration from three years to four years during their second term in office. Upon assumption of office, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) government decided to change the duration, in fulfillment of its party manifesto and campaign promise.
The NDC criticised the NPP for rushing to make the duration four-years without putting the needed infrastructure, including syllabi and textbooks, in place. However, those in support of the four-year duration argued that increasing the number of the years would help reverse the high number of students who were unable to qualify to the universities and other tertiary institutions, because of inadequate preparation.
The first batch of four-year SHS students, under the reforms introduced by the New Patriotic Party (NPP), is expected to enter the fourth year in the 2010/11 academic year. | | | | | | |
|